Skip to content
Raka Adrianto
Back to all projects

Research & Consulting

Mine Waste as a Sustainable Resource for Facing Bricks

2021

LCA & carbon accounting consultant (co-author)

Research case study

Cradle-to-gate LCA and carbon accounting for facing bricks made with 40 wt% mine tailings, co-published in the Journal of Cleaner Production.

About this study.

I led the environmental life cycle assessment and carbon accounting for Wienerberger's waste-derived facing bricks, quantifying a company-specific blend where 40 wt% of the loam is replaced by Plombières mine tailings. Modelling in SimaPro 9.2 with Ecoinvent 3.6 and the EU Environmental Footprint 3.0 method showed the tailings bricks reduce impacts by about 10% on average across categories, up to 32% for minerals and metals and 18% for toxicity, while climate change benefits stay below 1% because energy and process emissions dominate. The work is documented in the peer-reviewed study Mine waste as a sustainable resource for facing bricks (Veiga Simão et al., Journal of Cleaner Production 133118, 2022), where I am a co-author. This is a research and consulting engagement, not a claim of commercial deployment.

Key visuals.

Based on the December 2021 LCA exchange and the published study, with the public impact results.

System boundary

Scenario 1 · Standard bricks
Life cycle flowchart for standard fired bricks: loam, clay and other raw materials are transported into brick manufacturing (mixing, forming, drying, firing, packaging), producing one tonne of bricks for the use phase and end of life, with the cradle-to-gate system boundary and Ecoinvent background data.
Scenario 2 · Tailings bricks
Life cycle flowchart for tailings-derived bricks: 40 wt% Plombières tailings enter under a zero-burden waste approach with a cut-off, joining clay and reduced loam through the same brick manufacturing stages to one tonne of bricks, with transport of waste materials to the factory inside the cradle-to-gate boundary.

Cradle-to-gate LCA of 1 tonne of facing bricks, modelled in SimaPro 9.2 with Ecoinvent 3.6 and the EU Environmental Footprint 3.0 method. Both products meet the same technical and environmental requirements. Flowcharts: Adrianto, L.R. (2021), LCA exchange with Wienerberger.

Comparative impacts

  • Climate change

    −0.5%
  • Ozone depletion

    0%
  • Ionising radiation

    −0.5%
  • Photochemical ozone formation

    −4%
  • Particulate matter

    −11%
  • Human toxicity, non-cancer

    −13%
  • Human toxicity, cancer

    −26%
  • Acidification

    −6%
  • Eutrophication, freshwater

    −19%
  • Eutrophication, marine

    −5%
  • Eutrophication, terrestrial

    −6%
  • Ecotoxicity, freshwater

    −14%
  • Land use

    −8%
  • Water use

    −9%
  • Resource use, fossils

    −0.5%
  • Resource use, minerals and metals

    −32%
  • PEF endpoint single score

    −7%

Reduction in impact versus standard bricks (Scenario 1 = 100%). Values read from Figure 5 of Veiga Simão et al. (2022), Journal of Cleaner Production 133118.

Contribution analysis

  • Energy and direct emissions dominate

    Manufacturing energy and direct process emissions drive most midpoint indicators, so swapping raw materials alone cannot decarbonize brick production.

  • Raw materials drive toxicity and resource impacts

    Extracting clay, loam and filler is the largest contributor to particulate matter, human and eco-toxicity, eutrophication and mineral depletion in the standard blend.

  • Tailings substitution cuts the raw-material burden

    Replacing loam with Plombières tailings reduces raw-material-stage impacts by 1% to 15% depending on the category, with the largest gains in resource use, toxicity and eutrophication.

  • Transport adds a small, offsetting burden

    Hauling tailings to the plant adds impacts, but they stay smaller than the savings from avoided primary extraction.

Contribution analysis from the December 2021 LCA exchange with Wienerberger, summarized qualitatively.

Key results

−10%

average impact reduction across EF 3.0 categories

−32%

resource use, minerals and metals

−18%

toxicity-related indicators

<1%

climate change benefit

−7%

PEF single score

Published results: Veiga Simão et al. (2022), Journal of Cleaner Production 133118.